<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Stay N' Alive - Latest Comments in Twitter Looking Internally to Add Groups Functionality?</title><link>http://staynalive.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:55:38 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter Looking Internally to Add Groups Functionality?</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/03/06/twitter-looking-internally-to-add-groups-functionality/#comment-1275670</link><description>Personally, I think that they'll probably see which of the third-party implementations they like and use it as inspiration (should the actually move forward with it).  That said, their "radar" should pretty much just be "make the service reliable". &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One could also make a compelling argument for not complicating a service that (aside from outages and other technical snafu's) has really done well *because it's so simple*.  For that reason, I think adding groups would probably be a mistake.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Interesting to know that they're thinking about it, though.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Great post, cheers!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brett Kelly</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:55:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>