<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Stay N' Alive - Latest Comments in Twitter Kills Important Features on the API With Just a Few Hours Notice</title><link>http://staynalive.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:15:58 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter Kills Important Features on the API With Just a Few Hours Notice</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/05/31/twitter-kills-important-features-on-the-api-with-just-a-few-hours-notice/#comment-566545</link><description>it just has to do with taking a reactive instead of proactive approach to development. &lt;br&gt;moving their api to a cloud (amazon's or someone else's) would relieve a lot of their stress. it's difficult to stress-test any application or api, especially when it's setup to have so many different points of I/O.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;this is the post i was talking about in my last comment. it's a bit more of a rant than anything else, but i'm just getting frustrated by all of the content-less noise that people are generating around what is going on with Twitter. &lt;a href="http://www.naterkane.com/blog/2008/05/29/a-tweetcar-named-desire/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.naterkane.com/blog/2008/05/29/a-twee...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">naterkane</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 04:15:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Kills Important Features on the API With Just a Few Hours Notice</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/05/31/twitter-kills-important-features-on-the-api-with-just-a-few-hours-notice/#comment-566405</link><description>They say they know how to fix it, and based on their latest blog post, they&lt;br&gt;seem to have the expertise to do it.  With mistakes like yesterday's though,&lt;br&gt;I still wonder what's going on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jessestay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 03:01:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Kills Important Features on the API With Just a Few Hours Notice</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/05/31/twitter-kills-important-features-on-the-api-with-just-a-few-hours-notice/#comment-566391</link><description>I wonder if the Twitter staff have commissioned an externally-evaluated code audit on both the core processes and the API calls because from the outside looking in, I doubt that any amount of new hardware will boost Twitter reliability.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Bernie Goldbach</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 02:54:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Kills Important Features on the API With Just a Few Hours Notice</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/05/31/twitter-kills-important-features-on-the-api-with-just-a-few-hours-notice/#comment-566115</link><description>no, but will do. thanks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 01:00:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Kills Important Features on the API With Just a Few Hours Notice</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/05/31/twitter-kills-important-features-on-the-api-with-just-a-few-hours-notice/#comment-566056</link><description>Brent, I'm not sure what that is - have you tried submitting a request over&lt;br&gt;at Get Satisfaction? (getsatisfaction.com/twitter)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jessestay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:43:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Kills Important Features on the API With Just a Few Hours Notice</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/05/31/twitter-kills-important-features-on-the-api-with-just-a-few-hours-notice/#comment-566042</link><description>right on. i can dig that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;lately I have been getting this fun little popup asking me to log my username and password AFTER I have logged in, and mostly when I go to the Replies section. I click Cancel, and it goes away... for a few minutes. Any idea what it is? &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/mopedronin/2540736294/sizes/o/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.flickr.com/photos/mopedronin/2540736...&lt;/a&gt; Besides 'annoying' I mean.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And 'Twitter is over capacity'... &amp;gt;.&amp;gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:40:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Kills Important Features on the API With Just a Few Hours Notice</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/05/31/twitter-kills-important-features-on-the-api-with-just-a-few-hours-notice/#comment-565962</link><description>Brent, in layman's terms, be very careful relying on Twitter as your main&lt;br&gt;underlying business model.  They have admitted and shown their architecture&lt;br&gt;is not ready for it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jessestay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:18:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Kills Important Features on the API With Just a Few Hours Notice</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/05/31/twitter-kills-important-features-on-the-api-with-just-a-few-hours-notice/#comment-565928</link><description>I'm afraid I didn't understand a single thing written in this article. What is it you are trying to say, in layman's terms?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Brent</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:06:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Kills Important Features on the API With Just a Few Hours Notice</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/05/31/twitter-kills-important-features-on-the-api-with-just-a-few-hours-notice/#comment-565917</link><description>naterkane I agree and that's why they're under the gun.  People are under&lt;br&gt;the impression they're much bigger than they are when in reality they don't&lt;br&gt;have the infrastructure to handle their popularity.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jessestay</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 00:05:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Kills Important Features on the API With Just a Few Hours Notice</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/05/31/twitter-kills-important-features-on-the-api-with-just-a-few-hours-notice/#comment-565888</link><description>I just wrote the other day about anyone who relies on an API they don't control as a critical part of their business or app are idealistic (and maybe even foolish to a degree). APIs that are developed by larger companies (Yahoo!, Amazon, etc.) who are just extending an existing infrastructure are of course reasonably reliable enough that many people have had great successes building on those APIs. A small company like Twitter however can't be trusted to be anything more than a toy. A toy that has been very useful and changed the way many people and companies communicate, but still just a toy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">naterkane</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 23:56:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>