<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Stay N' Alive - Latest Comments in Twitter Continues to Fail Developers, Why They Will Still Succeed</title><link>http://staynalive.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://staynalive.disqus.com/twitter_continues_to_fail_developers_why_they_will_still_succeed/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:00:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter Continues to Fail Developers, Why They Will Still Succeed</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/06/27/twitter-continues-to-fail-developers-why-they-will-still-succeed/#comment-55721047</link><description>&lt;p&gt;To this day I still get the blue whale once in a while.  However, I guess I was wrong on twitter.  First to market in the micro-post space definitely helped them.   Then when the celebs jumped aboard the masses came in to stay.  Any "Twitter Kille"r will now need to offer something special that twitter doesn't offer (what that is I don't know).    I need to give them props for coming up with such a simple idea which easy site to develop and get up and running.   I sure wish I thought of it a year earlier. :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Lessnau</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 14:00:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Continues to Fail Developers, Why They Will Still Succeed</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/06/27/twitter-continues-to-fail-developers-why-they-will-still-succeed/#comment-764267</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know a few that are already, actually.  They have asked that I not blog&lt;br&gt;about them yet because they want to be absolutely sure they are prepared for&lt;br&gt;a load.  One in particular that I am thinking of is actually profitable at&lt;br&gt;the moment - they're coming, that's for sure.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:01:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Continues to Fail Developers, Why They Will Still Succeed</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/06/27/twitter-continues-to-fail-developers-why-they-will-still-succeed/#comment-762819</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It is unbelievable that someone with a bit of cash and some smarts does not developer a Twitter killer and put it out of its misery.    It's not like they are serving Youtube sized files, they are serving simple text messages.  The problem is they built the service on an unstable foundation and continue to patch holes and plug leaks while the foundation continues to crumble.  The time is so right for someone with a few hundred thousand dollars to build a Twitter knock off that actually works.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Lessnau</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:16:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>