<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Stay N' Alive - Latest Comments in Twitter Continues to Fail Developers, Why They Will Still Succeed</title><link>http://staynalive.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:01:08 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Twitter Continues to Fail Developers, Why They Will Still Succeed</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/06/27/twitter-continues-to-fail-developers-why-they-will-still-succeed/#comment-764267</link><description>I know a few that are already, actually.  They have asked that I not blog&lt;br&gt;about them yet because they want to be absolutely sure they are prepared for&lt;br&gt;a load.  One in particular that I am thinking of is actually profitable at&lt;br&gt;the moment - they're coming, that's for sure.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">jessestay</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:01:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Continues to Fail Developers, Why They Will Still Succeed</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/06/27/twitter-continues-to-fail-developers-why-they-will-still-succeed/#comment-762819</link><description>It is unbelievable that someone with a bit of cash and some smarts does not developer a Twitter killer and put it out of its misery.    It's not like they are serving Youtube sized files, they are serving simple text messages.  The problem is they built the service on an unstable foundation and continue to patch holes and plug leaks while the foundation continues to crumble.  The time is so right for someone with a few hundred thousand dollars to build a Twitter knock off that actually works.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John Lessnau</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 12:16:47 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>