<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Stay N' Alive - Latest Comments in The iPhone Needs Privacy Controls</title><link>http://staynalive.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://staynalive.disqus.com/the_iphone_needs_privacy_controls/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:32:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The iPhone Needs Privacy Controls</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/the-iphone-needs-privacy-controls/#comment-967237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not saying Facebook is perfect - they just have one of the better  &lt;br&gt;models amongst the other social networks out there.  They also  &lt;br&gt;corrected their mistake and allowed users to set privacy controls  &lt;br&gt;related to beacon - the iPhone has no such controls.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:32:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The iPhone Needs Privacy Controls</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/the-iphone-needs-privacy-controls/#comment-967155</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Suggesting that Facebook is a model of privacy is a stretch at best.  Those are the same folks that brought us beacon.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Joseph Scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 12:24:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>