<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Stay N' Alive - Latest Comments in Screenshots Emerge of the New Twitter Retweet Feature</title><link>http://staynalive.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://staynalive.disqus.com/screenshots_emerge_of_the_new_twitter_retweet_feature/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:40:28 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Screenshots Emerge of the New Twitter Retweet Feature</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/#comment-22168662</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I find this update worth considering, but seems like my twitter profile is not as lucky as other &lt;br&gt;lucky people who see this new update&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Harsh Agrawal</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 22:40:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screenshots Emerge of the New Twitter Retweet Feature</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/#comment-22041990</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nick, I'm going to click through to your original blog post in just a moment. Currently when I want to retweet, I switch over to slandr and use its one-button retweet functionality. Once I get the Twitter version, I'll compare the two and see which one I like better.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">John E. Bredehoft (Empoprises)</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 10:55:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screenshots Emerge of the New Twitter Retweet Feature</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/#comment-22011303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No problem Nick - thanks for sharing that with me!  I wanted to make sure&lt;br&gt;you got plenty of credit for being first with those.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:45:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screenshots Emerge of the New Twitter Retweet Feature</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/#comment-22010683</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the mention Jesse.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Nick Shin</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:36:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screenshots Emerge of the New Twitter Retweet Feature</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/#comment-22008362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;True, Chris--I hope you're right about that.  Then again, the RT with a comment isn't just a copy, so . . . I'm in "let's see what it looks like in action" mode.  How a thing is designed to be used and how people actually use it (lists being a case in point) don't always match.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">axisportals</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 23:01:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screenshots Emerge of the New Twitter Retweet Feature</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/#comment-22008277</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The question of threaded replies, though... Will it be a FriendFeed model or a Blellow model? Will the replies be visible to all or just the person who posted the original tweet, or to the original poster and the retweeter?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No matter how it's done, though, I don't see Twitter satisfying everyone. Unless Twitter starts pushing off people who continue to use the old way, which would probably turn into a PR disaster for them, I don't see the copy &amp;amp; paste RT dying any time soon.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Charabaruk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:59:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screenshots Emerge of the New Twitter Retweet Feature</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/#comment-22008179</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think this will ease the "echo chamber", since it merely brings up the retweeted post, rather than making a duplicate as the current, old method does&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Charabaruk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:56:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screenshots Emerge of the New Twitter Retweet Feature</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/#comment-22007656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The threaded replies really would bring twitter in closer proximity to the FF experience, but I do wonder how listing out the RTs will impact the Twitter economy.  I tend not to like the echo chamber that endless RTing creates.  Will this ease that or make it worse? With lists already in place, do we really need to RT?  Why, for instance, *ever* RT Mashable or Scoble?  Stick them in a list, run the list feed to a widget, all done. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">axisportals</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:45:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screenshots Emerge of the New Twitter Retweet Feature</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/#comment-22006741</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Chris, I agree, but I think eventually people will forgo that if this is&lt;br&gt;easier.  Also, Twitter is going to add threaded replies I'm pretty sure, and&lt;br&gt;when that happens a comment to something like that would be pretty easy.  I&lt;br&gt;think this way will become the preferred method.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jesse Stay</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:28:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Screenshots Emerge of the New Twitter Retweet Feature</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/screenshots-emerge-of-the-new-twitter-retweet-feature/#comment-22006670</link><description>&lt;p&gt;One of the good things about the current method of retweeting is that it allows a person to add their own two cents to the content they're sending on. From these screenshots, it doesn't look like that's possible.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is a good addition by Twitter, but it's going to need some work if they intend everyone to actually put it to use. I like being able to add something, sometimes, to my retweets, so I certainly won't use the new method exclusively when I get it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Chris Charabaruk</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:27:00 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>