<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Stay N' Alive - Latest Comments in Pownce - Why it May be Worth Considering</title><link>http://staynalive.disqus.com/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:54:24 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Pownce - Why it May be Worth Considering</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/01/26/pownce-why-it-may-be-worth-considering/#comment-1275640</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm torn between the two at the moment. For now Twitter is winning. One reason is that I'm already established on it and I'm comfortable there. The other is the ability to update by SMS which I find great. One big benefit I see with Pownce though is that it appears to follow links, unlike Twitter.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;seanabc (on both networks)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sean McGoldrick</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:54:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pownce - Why it May be Worth Considering</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/01/26/pownce-why-it-may-be-worth-considering/#comment-1275639</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just can't use Twitter. It's not even as useful as straight text messaging on a mobile.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;Besides it's near crippled non-feature set, it's interment up-time just sucks out nearly everything that looks like utility.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;p&gt;BTW, I've added you on Pownce... ; -)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wayne Smallman</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 12:45:17 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>