http://staynalive.disqus.com/enFri, 02 Jan 2009 22:44:36 -0000http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/07/15/monstercablecom-oblivious-to-seo/#comment-4858360i used to find this case, but i don't really know what was happen :(rahachFri, 02 Jan 2009 22:44:36 -0000http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/07/15/monstercablecom-oblivious-to-seo/#comment-907388Does SeaMonkey check Google for the malware? That's all Firefox 3 is<br>checking, which is why it's blocked. The odd thing is that according to<br>Google, this has been happening for months and Monster cable hasn't noticed<br>at all.jessestayWed, 16 Jul 2008 02:28:05 -0000http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/07/15/monstercablecom-oblivious-to-seo/#comment-907347When I ran a hosting company, I had customers whose sites had similar problems. In all cases, users had uploaded malware scripts embedded in comments, to bulletin boards, or blogs. When they found those posts and removed them, and asked Google to re-spider their site, the warnings disappeared. <br><br>The newest (1.1.10) version of SeaMonkey, which is the full-suite flavor ot the Mozilla browser, doesn't seem to have any problem at <a href="http://MonsterCable.com" rel="nofollow">MonsterCable.com</a> It's actually a little newer than Foxfire 3....PaulDingWed, 16 Jul 2008 02:20:57 -0000