DISQUS

DISQUS Hello! Stay N' Alive is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

Stay N' Alive

Jump to original thread »
Author

House Committee Seeks to Tighten the Content You Can See in Government

Started by jessestay · 1 year ago

reddit_url = ‘http://staynalive.com/articles/2008/07/08/house-committee-seeks-to-tighten-the-content-you-can-see-in-government/’;
Representative John Culberson, the Twittering and Qik’ing Congressman from my good old home town of Houston, Texas, has been on a rampage this morning about a proposed new regulation for the House of ... Continue reading »

6 comments

  • John Culberson

    1 year ago

    Heres how the House leadership will use this rule to control where and what I say and even exercise influence over your website/blog etc

    If the Ds rule change were in effect today, before I could post this, your website/blog would have to be preapproved as complying with House rules, my post would require a disclaimer that it was "produced by a House office for official purposes," and the CONTENT of my post would have to be preapproved by the House Franking Committee as complying with "existing content rules and regulations."

    This is a violation of your First Amendment rights and mine, and is an outrageous attempt by House leadership to stifle and control you and me. If Rs were in charge I would be just as outraged - forget the party label - I do not want the federal gov't/House of Representatives certifying your website or the content of my posts. I am writing this post personally, in my official capacity, so it would fall precisely under their new rule and you and I would both be in violation unless we subjected ourselves and my words to their prior approval/editing.

    I am always ready to admit I am wrong but I am an attorney and this is what the letter means.

    This is a story worth following because I am going to continue to vigorously exercise my First Amendment rights on every social media outlet I can reach. Itis my right as an American and my duty as a representative.

    thanks

    John Culberson
    reply
  • jessestay

    1 year ago

    Representative Culberson, very great explanation - I agree, this is
    essential and will affect not only our government, but we as bloggers. I'm
    proud to have people like you represent Texas.
    reply
  • NanaWriteOn

    1 year ago

    Great post. The government is for the people, by the people and therefore must be heard and uncensored to the people. Keeping things in the light is best for everyone...
    LdsNana
    reply
  • Michael Foord

    1 year ago

    Well, it's not as clear cut as that. TechDirt is of the opion that Culberson is utterly disingenuous here.

    See:
    http://techdirt.com/articles/20080708/160252162...

    Their stance is that officially the rules *already* forbid it, the democrats are seeking clarification of outdated rules, and Culberson is using it as an opportunity to sling mud.
    reply
  • jessestay

    1 year ago

    IANAL (neither is TechDirt, I believe - Culberson is, however), but
    regardless, I welcome his mud slinging or whatever it is you call it. If
    there are already restrictions in place then maybe this will help bring some
    attention to that. My interpretation however is that the current
    restrictions are already vague, which currently allow for him to Tweet while
    on official business, etc (otherwise they wouldn't be proposing this
    restriction - I believe much of it is in reponse to his existing Twittering
    and Qikking on Capitol Hill). Whereas the new restrictions would require
    every Tweet, Qik, etc. to be pre-approved by this committee. It's socialism
    at its finest if you ask me.
    reply
  • thomasz

    1 year ago

    More laws to govern our daily lives =[
    reply

Add New Comment

Returning? Login